Re: What's in this for me?

You will have difficulties to discredit me since i am not part of the official scientists group (so i am open minded to new phenomenon/technology) and i am not part of any group which has hidden interests (like parazapper who is clearly here to get money from desperate infected people, not to improve the technology, see our previous discussions about this...)

I have not said that what you or any person on curezone have experienced is false (except for the the undercover marketers), however i have said again and again that what you think may have happen is not necessarily what has happen. This is one of the principle of the scientific mind, be aware that you can fool yourself.

For example if you use several treatments at the same time how can you be sure what produced the killing of the parasites ?
And if you have not seen dead parasitic worms parts eliminated in the phlegm or in the feces or at least felt crawling sensation / contraction sensations / unhooking sensations, pressure sensations, then how do you know that you were infected by parasitic worms (of course some parasitic worms are microscopic but the common ones are big enough to be seen/felt)

Alternative treatments sellers love to tell people to combine several treatments at the same time because in doing so they sell more of their products and make more money. But this does not mean that all treatments are efficient, from my experience only a few treatments are worthy.
What i am asking is simple : somebody who claim that a treatment/device manages to kill parasitic worms should be forced to provide at least one little objective proof (an experiment done at home is ok) that this is true.

If you think that only because somebody says something that this is true, i am sorry but this is the definition of being ignorant and gullible... (i have nothing against you, just discussing) Tweet