Re: GAS model outdated and inaccurate...

Yes, convention med can prove both Cushing's and Addison's and "AF" is supposedly closer to Addison's, but as you say somewhat in between, but I still can't believe with all the technology today that if "AF" was real they can't scientifically prove that.

My point about alt med being very prosperous is there should be no reason alt med schools don't have the resourced to prove "AF". Alt medicine will be taken much more serious if they can scientifically prove the conditions they believe in.


"This is what I was trying to say earlier...There's no need to diagnose a new illness...just keep shoveling meds that don't help down the sicks' throats. In doing so, you maintain a life long client."

But a lot of those patients will get fed up and when the are told by friends or stumble across some alt med website that lists symptoms they have, they will start gravitating to alt med and that means conventional med and big pharma will lose many millions as what's been happening over the last couple of decades and why would conventional med want that to happen?


"Main stream medicine is not the be-all and end-all."

I totally agree and I still think conventional med's approach to healing sucks--they rather treat than heal--but I trust conventional med much more in diagnostics even though they are not perfect.

I just see alternative med basing most of what they believe and do on theory and if you really look, not a lot of people are truly getting better from them as you think should. I mean alternative med is becoming more popular year after year, yet health problems in society keep getting worse and worse. Seems like alt med isn't working too good. Even most people at this forum aren't really getting better.
Tweet