CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Loquat...
 
loquat1 Views: 1,282
Published: 7 y
 
This is a reply to # 2,354,622

Re: Loquat...


I've substantially edited an earlier post (should have been a new post really), so I've copy/pasted the main edit below so it can be re-read by those following this thread:

As for the 'deflation' you feel is caused by Finalism, I believe I have an answer for that too. But for now, I hope we can agree that our personal moods/feelings are not the most reliable guides to revealed truth. If they were, there would be no ECT. Speaking for myself, I can think of few things more exciting than what a Finalist future might bring, or even what a Finalist interpretation of the Bible reveals. It is such a simple and elegant view of the Bible that I am amazed I ever entertained any other views or ideas.

Compared to all the complications and questions unnecessarily raised by futurism, it is a breath of fresh air that positively bristles with excitement and possibilities. But best of all, it's real strength lies in the fact that it sees Jesus on nearly every page of the OT. And not only that, but it also puts the focal point of redemptive history where it truly belongs - ie in the first advent, when God first breaks into human history in a direct and sustained way. 

The second advent, important though it is, simply seals the history set in motion by the first advent. As Carver puts it, it's 'The Great Consummation'. In that sense, it is fundamentally 'Preterist' in concept, even if not the 'full' version that goes awry when it comes to the second advent. Which only goes to prove that you should never have two divisions within the same school. 'Full' and 'Partial' sound too much like baked & half-baked to me, which is not exactly flattering to either.

Henceforth, may I suggest that Full Preterist should instead be referred to as 'Realized Eschatology', and Preterist reserved exclusively for the Finalist view, so that the two become (in effect) interchangeable? I think that's a much better nomenclature, and pre-empts all those daft questions about whether one is baked or half-baked, full or partial. What say you? 

 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.422 sec, (2)