Re: Loquat...

Neither am I. I'm talking about rejecting Him now, but accepting Him later after He returns when I see the evidence of my own eyes, and the consequences of continued rejection.

Grief, pinning you down on this one is like trying to nail jelly to a tree. How about you explain yourself more fully/clearly on this one to avoid all this toing & froing? Or do you deliberately avoid doing so coz you know your position is untenable, and it will only become more evident the more you clarify? Why not just admit that what you believe is second chancism by any other name, despite your earlier denials to the contrary?

When I first raised the question, you accused me of making unfounded assumptions about your beliefs, yet everything you've said since then points in exactly that direction. Again, you seem to be bending over backwards to avoid the obvious implications of your own posts.

So you also want your cake and eat it? But it's mine. All mine I tell you. And yeah, bridges are also out of bounds for ya.