Whoever produces the most studies in support of their view is the winner, right? Wrong. As I've said before, there are studies to support BOTH sides. This is where the QUALITY of the evidence comes into play. I can sit here and cut-n-paste a big list of studies just like you did in support of Amalgams , but that doesn't get us anywhere.....especially when you're just gonna make a blanket statement like "those are biased because the govt funded them" without even considering the evidence.
Again, the HIGHEST level of evidence is the most difficult to dispute. This isn't about "I already listed some studies SO THERE", it's about a critical evaluation of the available data. But it seems everyone here has already made up their minds even though I doubt many have truly tried to evaluate both sides of the issue....as I am trying to do.