"yes, but do you notice that it did not make any difference to our society when they found out the outcome? in fact, you cannot even locate it on their website any longer. .....but, the next example IS the government conducting a study, then ignoring the results, just as they did with the Nhanes III:"
I'm sorry but you're inferring way too much here. Conspiracy! Conspiracy! One study does not prove or mandate ANYTHING, regardless of the topic. A single study is just another piece of a much greater picture. It seems you would suggest taking the results of this ONE study and throw all other contradicting studies out the window. This is why you MUST know the evidence on both sides, so that you may more fully evaluate contradictory evidence.
What were the flaws in the NHAMES study? For starters, it was epidemiological.....which means there were no controls. They found an association between many chronic disease states and a higher number of amalgams. How should this be interpreted?