you say: "Klinghardt and Mercola have better credentials for developing or evaluating a chelation protocol than either one of us, or of dentists like Huggins or Morales". that is your opinion and why push it on me? hal huggins is the whole reason we even discuss the mercury issue in the states. he has studied it for over 30 yrs and dedicated his life to it. he went back to college and got a degree in to learn all the science behind it. morales has been a dentist for 30 yrs. so, to say mercola and klighardt are better qualified is not something i would agree with. not all that long ago, mercola (altho a dr for many years) was a runner who was very ill because he ate a ton of grains. he studied and eliminated them. he practices a lot of general medicine, and altho he lists a mercury protocol, huggins and morales are in the field of dentistry and have hands on experience in dealing with mercury poisoned ppl.

like i said before, if you want to argue chelation protocols, then why try doing it with me? you are not going to change my opinions. you were the one who launched the whole attack on me. i was responding to the poster and doing my own thing. also, we do not use DMPS or DMSA, so why do you keep posting to me about how harmful it is? on one of my original posts on this subject, i took info from the DMPS website you are talking about, and i cited it. is that perhaps where you got the site from? if you want to debate chelation, they have a chelation debate forum on curezone.

Torrie
<