Re: 12 POINTS on MERCURY TOXICITY
i do not care if you think i don't know about chelation. i do not follow cutler and am not interested in your attacks with references to his work. the porphyrin tests work just fine and they are the best diagnostic tool for mercury poisoning. drs will take into consideration other factors. i didn't read all the posts from that person because i was only responding to certain posts, not all, which is one reason curezone is not intended for medical advice or curing anything. you seem to think curezone is a replacement for a dr. i, like many others, do not believe in redistribution. i believe stirring up mercury with certain chelators and not pulling it thru with others, is a waste of time and can make u sick, but i do not refer to that as redistribution. we don't use dmps and dmsa. i don't believe in it and as far as i know levy and huggins are still against it. now, hal mite b using small doses, but that was a recent change and i am still not comfortable with giving it to our patients. you say i don't know much about chelation since i disagree with you. isn't that interesting. so i don't believe in the stuff u do, so what? who are u?
BUT ONE OF THE BIGGEST ATTACKS YOU MADE ON ME WAS SAYING I RECOMMEND TESTING FOR MERCURY. I DO EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE. I RECOMMEND AGAINST IT. but i listen to the patient. some want to do it no matter what. i will advise them against it, but with the new FDA lawsuit being talked about recently, it may be a good idea. i have had all the tests and i can use them in court if needed. attacking me about wasting ppl's money just takes the cake. why did you begin an attack on me and continue on with it?
there is a debate forum for ppl who want to argue about chelation. it is called the chelation debate forum. why don't you go there instead?
Torrie
<