CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Gleevac versus oleander
chrisb1 Views: 8,287
Published: 13 years ago
This is a reply to # 1,622,001

Re: Gleevac versus oleander

The real cost of Gleevec in the treatment of Patients with Advanced CML...........

They used a computer model which took into account 5 years of treatment from the start of treatment. They estimated that a patient in accelerated phase would “accrue an additional 2.09 QALYs with Gleevec compared to conventional therapies, while patients in blast crisis will accrue an additional 0.58 QALYs”. They also report that this improvement comes with a price, approximately **$40,000** per additional QALY more than conventional treatment for patients in accelerated phase.
For patients in blast phase, the cost was almost **$60,000** more per additional QALY.

Researchers Comments: These estimates of the cost of Gleevec® treatment are probably in line with the costs in the US for treating similar patients and underscore the expensive nature of this therapy.
**Obviously the most important economic saving would be to improve the up-front cure rate of patients with CML and not have to rely on expensive palliative therapy**.

Gleevec versus Oleander?
No contest, either in price or efficacy.



Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


Donate to CureZone

CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with

Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2023

3.580 sec, (1)