Re: You are arguing apples and oranges and doing a poor job of it

What an piece of work you are - and a rude one at that!

Nice hatchet job of attacking the messenger and avoiding addressing the mistakes and misrepresentations in your other posts that I pointed out.  The blog site in question's entire premise was false - trying to paint the study as saying that only 2-3% of cancer patients survive chemo when the study actually showed that chemo only raised cancer survival by 2.1 to 2.3 percent.   As I said, apples and oranges and an obvious attempt to discredit a study that that the mainstream wag didn't like by misrepresenting it, the same as you are doing here with your posts.

Luella was hospitalized because the smog in California triggered an asthma attack when she visited her children.  She only got well when she got out of the hospital, threw away her inhalers and prescriptions and nebulized with colloidal silver and lobelia extract as well as took a Chinese herbal formula for her lungs.

My back injury was due to physical trauma and was successfully treated by a chiropracter and supplementation.

If you are going to take such an interest in myself and Luella, perhaps you should pay closer attention.

I must say you are certainly winning lots of points by quoting from a mainstream naysayer blogger who dispagages CureZone.  You claim to have passed courses in statistics.  Did you perchance take any courses in debate? You obviously missed the ones on civility.