The review is one of many at amazon.com.This one was from a 2 star rating and I do not have permission to use his/her username.There are 21 one star ratings which are much more critical.It is as it is and it is subjective criticism from readers of the book in question.From what Ive seen I see no need to read this body of work much less debate it.Please except my apology if I have offended you in any way.I tend to be an analytical ass according to my girlfriend.