One review, find more. I disagreed with most of what was written. The one thing that Taubes did not do is a biased writing. He simply stated "the facts", and what the reviewer was forgetting, that he did a "history", so duh, there will be studies that are pre-1960. In fact, Taubes goes back into the 1800,s.
My guess, this book was way over the reviewers head.
And Grassman, if your intent is to just dismiss what I feel and think about this issue, and want to debate me? I ain't going there. I guess you'd really need to read the book than dig up some anonymous idiots review.