Re: mortality rates

I think that scientific method is the best we have at this point in time, and as far as it is useful, I use it. It is a good standard to judge information by. If a better system came along, I would use that. So your assessment is incorrect.

I'm not interested in playing word games with you, this is a road I've been down before, and I find it tedious, as well as pointless.

If anyone else reading my posts has a problem with understanding my meaning, I will happily explain, but I wont be getting into semantic arguments with you Bf.

I don't care what your personal opinion of me is, I neither know you personally, or am ever likely too, so it is irrelevant. You have been trying to suggest that there is emotion involved in my view of scientific method, and I have indicated that there is not. You are now trying to indicate that I am dishonest, because I do not have the emotional attachment that you believe people should have, and you are wrong.

As for Conspiracy websites, if anyone else would like to know what I meant by my statement, (if you don't understand my meaning), please email me, and I will happily explain, rather than see this thread get bogged down in semantic waffle, and endless dictionary quotes.

spud