Re: There's more...

"Then you can honestly make a statement, with some degree of accuracy, until you can prove causality all you are doing is making stuff up, to suit your view."

I can honestly make the statement because I have read the literature. It is convincing. I won't be getting a vaccine anytime soon, and I will certainly try to stop anyone I know from getting them as well. If a person steps onto the train tracks while a train is coming, and they are looking the other way, I'm going to say something to them, thats the least I can do.

"Do you have proof of this statement? If not, it is again just stuff you are making up to suit your view. This is not a "fact" it is just your opinion."

It's fact enough for me a thousands of others. I certainly do have proof enough.

From my perspective of your messages, everything you agree with could be fact and everything you disagree with is opinion. The evidence is convincing and compelling, despite your "opinion".

"I have never said Science is infallible, in fact I've often said just the opposite. And no, some of the studies that have been presented here are not based on sound scientific principles, or scientific method, and the study you posted at the beginning of this thread falls into the unscientific category."

I never said you did. And again Science is merely accumulated knowledge, you can spout on about scientific method this and that, but I haven't found any study on vaccines that has ever met those principles, and if you could show me one I would greatly appreciate it. Perhaps it might change my "opinion" .
Tweet