Re: Your certificate has nothing to do with Obama's

"So state officials, like all government officials, are always completely truthful?

Health Department Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino said Friday she and the registrar of vital statistics, Alvin Onaka, have personally verified that the health department holds Obama's original birth certificate.

I wonder why they did not say that they had actually seen his original certificate and that it clearly stated that he was born in Hawaii.  That is not at all the same as saying that they have verified that the original certificate is on file.  Even if she or anyone were to make such a statement, it would not serve as one iota of proof, whereas the actual original certificate, which Obama has access to and could have release would serve as indisputable proof if found to be genuine and unaltered.'"

Their "personally verified" statement that the health department holds Obama's original birth certificate somehow means they haven't "seen" it.  Or that they're lying about it? Tony, Tony, Tony.  If I remember right, you live in Texas.  Right?  Isn't that where George W. Bush's arrest for cocaine possession was expunged from the records?  I have a book somewhere that verifies that to be true.  But then all Texas officials lied about it.  Yes, government officials - including George W. Bush, lie at times.  Is it because you live in Texas that you question the veracity of government officials?

"I would say that any concerned American citizen has a tangible interest in knowing for certain whether or not their President was born in the United States and is constitutionally eligible to serve as President.   The law referred to was enacted solely to prevent identity theft.  Now what do you think the chances of that happening are when it comes to Obama.

Once again, why has Obama not simply released a copy of his original long form birth certificate, which provides the actual location of birth as well as the hospital and attending physician.  No one has yet presented a plausible explanation as to why he has chosen to hide it, the same as there has been no plausible explanations as to why millions have been spent to keep his school and other records private.  One does not hide something that would be beneficial to them.

I note that you failed to provide a plausible explanation for failing to provide the long form certificate, which Obama could do.  Neither did you provide an explanation of his grandmother's contention that he was born in Kenya or the similar contentions of Kenyan officials.  Why would they possibly lie?  Obama on the other hand, has proven himself to be a liar extraordinaire."

Your logic is very twisted Tony.  Obama has presented a birth certificate/certificate of live birth just as anyone in his position is required to do.  There is no need to do anything more.  Obama isn't hiding anything - he has presented what is required to be president.

If Obama were born in Kenya, there would be a record of it - wouldn't there?  Nobody has produced one.

Back to the newspaper birth announcement.  How did they do that one Tony?