CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Supplemental D3 vs D3 from sunlight; ascorbate vs natural Vitamin C
 
chrisb1 Views: 19,450
Published: 15 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,614,581

Re: Supplemental D3 vs D3 from sunlight; ascorbate vs natural Vitamin C


Re' the role of Vitamin C

Natural and synthetic L-ascorbic acid are chemically identical and there are no known differences in their biological activities or bioavailabilities.
101. Gregory JF, 3rd. Ascorbic acid bioavailability in foods and supplements. Nutr Rev. 1993;51(10):301-303.

It is also true to say that scurvy will only respond to natural forms of whole-complex Vitamin C, but synthetic forms have been very successfully used (cured) against such diseases as poliomyelitis, eisenmenger syndrome, viral pneumonia and Multiple Scelorosis, to name just a few............
http://www.doctoryourself.com/klennerbio.html


The poster who stated that "Carbohydrates Kill" has made a rather sweeping statement that is inaccurate and misleading.

There is a huge distinction between consuming refined carbs' and natural complex carbs' in any beneficial or adverse health effect..........
http://www.diseaseproof.com/archives/healthy-food-unrefined-carbohydrates-enc...

http://www.diseaseproof.com/archives/diet-myths-fear-of-carbs-a-myth-debunked...


I am sure also that the Innuit diet is highly beneficial to health, and as I understand it is eaten in a mostly raw state.
Not very appealing to me, but each to their own.

Chrisb1.
 

Share


 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2025  www.curezone.org

0.172 sec, (1)