Re: Yes! Zappers do work

[quote]
First, it is the device that determines the signal.
[/quote]
Yes but the same signal can be produced by a different circuit, fact.


[quote]
Second, there is no product out there with the same signal that ParaZapper offers.
[/quote]
Really, what is so unique ? the constant current ? a similar or higher current can be reached by using a higher voltage (setable)
The precise frequency ? Maybe but you are the one claiming that a precise frequency is important and there is no proof of that since you don't use the Rife frequencies and the Rife technology. Hulda Clark technology is not based on using a precise frequency, she even mentions a range of frequencies depending the life stage of the harmful organism... (which can be in several khz)

The harmonics frequencies which you claim have the killing effect probably don't because at the necessary high frequency the intensity is so low that it has probably no effect (especially considering it has to go through the skin and the tissues of the human body first !)
See :
//www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=2203697#i
//www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=2204455#i
//www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=2204585#i


[quote]
Again, you are WRONG. I know exactly why I use the frequencies of the CAFL.
[/quote]
i bet that you don't really know, you just follow the trend and repeat to have more useless frequencies in your devices, it looks and sounds more impressive to the ignorant gullible.

[quote]
First, it has a long history of many user successes.
[/quote]
What successes ? Where are the proofs ? Only vague testimonials ? You can buy many fakes testimonials nowadays. Again there is no objective proof that these frequencies manage to kill one or several harmful organisms in a human body or in a similar environment, or please show me.


[quote]
People who have failed with both Beck and Clark zappers, have had and reported great success with Pad Type Rife/Crane devices.
[/quote]
Crane frequencies, not Rife frequencies. "Success" does not mean much. Please show me some proofs, not vague words.


[quote]
Second, the Rife CAFL is published and accessible to anyone who wants to utilize it. It is neither proprietary nor exclusive.
[/quote]
Yes and it seems that many frequencies have been copied pasted or slightly increased/decreased but there is no explanation why, so all these are words and unjustified claims... (And maybe smart marketing of zappers/frequency generators sellers ?


[quote]
Possibly no one on this forum but yes, other have claimed to have done so.
[/quote]
I bet that there is no objective proof, only words ?


[quote]
precision or resolution? How did you validate the accuracy?
[/quote]
precision 1Hz, accuracy measured with different oscilloscopes, the voltage and allowed intensity was 5times more than your devices (up to 35ma with 4 electrodes), and it allowed to produced the frequencies mentioned by Hulda Clark with 1Hz precision (so no need for harmonics)

[quote]
This supports what I say, more current is not going to do the job.
[/quote]
To kill warts, it works amazingly well, but to kill parasitic worms in a human body, poorly efficient compared to others treatments.


[quote]
3 points positive, 1 negative ( relative )?
[/quote]
Your theory of using more electrodes of the positive polarity is baseless and senseless (the electrons flow the other way) so i don't care about what you say.
But i have tried different positions, more electrodes of one polarity or more electrodes of the other polarity, on the palms of the hands and on the soles of the feet and even on others areas of the skin...


[quote]
What size electrodes? What material?
[/quote]
Whatever man, this is not important, up to 35mA was flowing with several strong paths from the top to the bottom.


[quote]
What is the resistance from ground to each positive? Total resistance combined in parallel?
[/quote]
This is not important, up to 35mA was flowing in the body... I remember having measured a resistance around 1500ohms or more depending on the contact area and depneding on the wetness of the skin/electrodes.


[quote]
Only where I have been forced to remove certain comments. Our position and comments have not changed since 2003 when we did our first survey.
[/quote]
Not true since i am aware and researching and experimenting with this technology since 2008 or 2009, and i have seen you claim that your devices can help to kill parasitic worms in a human body several times on these forums and on your websites...


[quote]
Once again, you show why you have so miserably failed. Your custom devices are no match for ParaZapper.
[/quote]
Your argument is weak, an electric signal is an electric signal, parazapper is just a brand...
Your devices have functionalities/frequencies which are based on nothing but repeating what others have said/done. So if you call this a superior technology, the level is really low...


[quote]
And again, I never will, at least until the regulations in the US change in a more reasonable fashion.
[/quote]
Yes because for the moment it is forbidden to lie and mislead too much (but you can do it just a little fortunately for you)
Tweet