CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: HIV undetectable
aifam55 Views: 12,657
Published: 9 years ago
This is a reply to # 2,218,313

Re: HIV undetectable

The essence of the article is that John Crane was also hiding Rife's work. Instead of being consistent with dividing down the true Rife frequencies, he used random numbers. Examples:
Rife 478,000 is divided by 627 which is commonly used as 727 or 728, but 727.5 would be better.
417,000 hertz original Rife is divided by 521 to come up with 800.4 hertz, which is rounded to 800 hertz.
120,000 hertz (tetanus) is divided by 1950 to come up with 120 hertz exactly.
789,000 hertz is divided by 1195 to come up with 660.3 which is rounded to 660 hertz. etc, etc.
Now you also see why the Crane frequencies should be used to the decimal point if you want to be more correct. Also you don't hit the original Rife frequency when using a 50% duty cycle when Crane used an even number to divide an original Rife frequency. A 50% duty cycle only hits the odd number multipliers. Now you see why they often use other duty cycles in applying the Crane frequencies, (such duty cycles may be 71% , 78%, 88%, 90%, 93%, depending on what random digit Crane used to divide the original Rife frequency by).

Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


Donate to CureZone

CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with

Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2023

1.469 sec, (1)