Re: More Questions

arn,
Will you, please, answer my question, which we asked already more than 3 times: Have you fasted yourself and for how long?

My answer to all your question is: GENERALLY FASTING WILL BE BETTER, BUT DEPENDS ON THE PERSON. HEALING SHOULD BE FASTER THAN WHEN EATING. More clear than that I can not be.

YOU SEEM TO BE NOT CLEAR YOURSELF, what means regular meals? Regular as in meat-potato, dairy-fruits, etc? In that case fasting would provide 5x - 10x faster results, at least. If you're actually talking natural hygiene/ or easy to assimilate raw juices/ fruits/ then it is case dependent. Amino-acid deficient (to be diagnosed by physician and tests he administered, not by you or any of us ONLINE), vitamin deficient, electrolyte deficient, enzyme deficient, and so forth, would be better off given these essential nutrients. Sometimes INTRAVENOUSLY in all cases you mentioned.

Generally, if premorbid status is good, for all of these cases 5 days should not be a problem, should be beneficial, SHOULD BE QUICKER, compared to eating status, then evaluate for the reaction: appearance, skin "turgor", blood pressure, heart rate, electrolytes, compare to initial ones, etc. Again keep in mind, I am not fasting supervisor, this is only an opinion.

A pregnant woman who is throwing her stomach off SHOULD NOT be having meals. Please, stop asking this. Throwing up is a clear sign that the stomach is eliminating, not digesting. Same applies to all other cases. Severely malnourished or burned individual, whose GIT has shut down, would only be harmed by "regular meals".

To be even more illustrative, for the hypothetical case, extreme case of a pregnant, severely malnourished woman, who has not been around much quality food for a good time, and who got a massive third degree burn, I personally, would opt for INTRAVENOUS GLUCOSE, AMINO-ACIDS, ANTIBIOTCS through the proper preparations, folate, iron gluconate, vitamins through gastric tube and so forth. Tweet