Re: Vindication of Dr. Clark and Rife

Thanks for a good post.

There are some things that are not entirely correct.

>- Hulda Clark used a LOW POWERED ELECTRICAL METHOD WITH BODY CONTACT to kill just parasites that relied on connecting it to the body with pads or metallic grips

Bacteria, protozoa, yeast, fungi, and other microbes are parasites when the live inside of the body of any other organism. Dr. Clark even lists many of these along with the resonant frequencies that she found for them.

>- this method does not really on frequency but instead relies on a sudden transfer of charge to the pathogen

Actually, the Clark zapper relies on more than this. It does rely on frequency and some frequencies are better than others for specific organisms. My studies bare this out. The zapper also relies on the sharp rising and falling edges of the square wave to induce ringing of the microbes at their resonant frequency. Just like tapping on a wine glass will cause it to ring. This is one reason that the Clark zapper can and does work without having the exact frequency.

>- the argument that one particular frequency has the ability to kill ALL harmful pathogens and parasites only shows a distinct lack of any allegiance to any understanding of physics or biochemchemical principles

Thank you. As I have said all along.

Tweet