Re: Vindication of Dr. Clark and Rife
"In
your all knowing wisdom on this topic, have you ever considered that maybe she
did not even try to diagnose herself."
Ahh, hit a sore point huh? The woman was 80 years old. I
seriously doubt that she tried to diagnose herself because the medical doctor
she saw did it for her - prior to her death. It is medically impossible to
list those things on a death certificate without both blood tests and bone
marrow biopsies. With that diagnosis prior to death there was no reason to
do an autopsy on the body.
Any practitioner making the claims that Clark did - including her trumped up
and erroneous diagnostic abilities, would have used her diagnostic abilities on
herself. By the time you hit 80 - unless your a marathoner, you have
significant aches and pains that aren't explainable in ordinary fashion.
The spinal story that was originally published by the family turned out to be
fake. Had she died from neck/spine and shoulder injuries that would have
been obvious at death.
There was obviously cancer in the family. The woman couldn't cure her
brother's cancer (that is a known fact) and she couldn't cure hers. It's
actually pretty simple.