CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Vindication of Dr. Clark and Rife
 
parazapper Views: 14,056
Published: 12 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,884,143

Re: Vindication of Dr. Clark and Rife


I agree that the method used is not the same as Dr. Clark but what I am saying is that it may well be that the end point is the same: the creation of specific harmonics that have a negative effect on the cancerous cells, virus, bacteria, etc.

Also, I want to say that there can be exceptions to almost anything. The purpose of the square wave is to produce harmonics, The purpose of modulated RF, in this case, is to produce harmonics. The whistling into the CB is producing sidebands ( harmonics ).

While not identical, it definitely gives credence to Rife and also gives credence to Clark in that frequencies do work although they may be generated by different methods.

From my own experience, the zapper absolutely had an effect on my cancer. It was gone very quickly.
 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.297 sec, (1)