Re: Vindication of Dr. Clark and Rife

Using my secret analog powers, I took my fingers out of the Cheetos bag, went on the innergoogle, and read the study. Sad news for the zapper society - what these guys used as their electric signal was *nothing* like what any zapper produces. Worse, their signal was specifically "anti-zapper" in two significant ways.

1. the easy one - it isn't a simple squarewave. They modulated a single-frequency sinewave onto a 27 MHz sinewave carrier. That's, like, radio, dude. This is a much more complex waveform that can not be compared to the simple zapper wavefore when trying to understand how it propogates through the body or interacts with cells.

2. the hard one - NO POSITIVE OFFSET. Oh, mama, what have they done?!?!? No squarewave, no harmonics, no offset; basically just whistling into a CB microphone.

I've done the cancer dance, and I really hope this works, but claiming it validates Clark's work is a very long stretch.

ak
Tweet