There me be a very few that enjoy having their heads chopped off but I would say the vast majority would find this beyond unpleasant. Is it not a "moral" judgment to say its okay to kill animals for their meat but not okay to kill humans for the sport of it? Hitler bad...meat processing plant okay? Why is there a separation? Could it be convenience? We know intrinsically that killing is not optimal.
Is it possible that judging something as "moral" over it being harmonious or coherent may be a kind of apologetics.
We are all playing this game together. If you had children and someone wanted to eat them, I am guessing that this would be a problem? Why would it? Explore this deeply then respond. It is easy to say that pleasure over pain or harmony over disharmony is a moral choice but I think it goes way deeper than that into the structure of an evolving consciousness. Do we continue to create a negative loosh structure that harbors suffering as a byproduct or do we consciously carve a different path?