This is a reply to # 1,866,755

In my post above, I have shared that disagreeing with him results in him posting attacks & lies about the person who disagrees with him. Below I have underlined the lies he has posted about me, changing references to me into "U" (so that more lies aren't permanently cached on the 'net about me).

 

The purpose of this additional post is to:

-- provide evidence for the Webmaster/others of him posting attacks & lies when someone disagrees with him, whether or not they've attacked or lied about him

-- provide evidence of him using the same underhanded tactics that he accuses others of using

--remind the Webmaster/others that these lies & accusations are slanderous; that they are 'permanently cached' on Google, The Wayback Machine and other 'net databases; and that action needs to be taken to prevent further damage. 

 

This man DOES impede freedom of speech on CureZone in many different ways. Onward...

For the record, my posting history on the Liver Flush Debate forum in the last 10 months (without the nine posts I made 4-6 years ago -full history in link below) http://curezone.com/forums/s.asp?f=476&c=0&ob=d&m=unyquity :

 

Zero personal attacks; no use of any poster's name or ID; nothing but information, quotes & questions (rhetorical, challenging & information seeking).

 

The closing of one of my posts: http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1850507#i

 

 http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1852852#i LOL!!!  When did I ever say the common bile duct?  I am really surprised that someone who at least makes an attempt to post evidence was not smart enough t realize that there is more than one duct involved!  Luckily there are other people who know how to do research and realize that there are more than one duct I am smart enough to know there is more that one duct involved; I never claimed there was not more than one duct involved (all I did was provide sources showing the size of the common bile duct - no claims, no more, no less).

Since it seemed obvious to me that he was referring to the common bile duct, I immediately responded and asked him exactly which duct he was referring to that was 2-4mm/8mm maximum...and never received a reply. Yet he continued claiming that I had limited knowledge.

Continuing (more lies posted by him about me in the same or other threads):

http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1852880#i
Maybe if they actually research the subject then they will also realize why the study posted by "U" was really irrelevant.  Of course she would have known that if she understood what she was reading in the first place and realized that there are more ducts than just the common bile duct. I did understand what I was reading; stones larger than 1cm passing spontaneously is relevant in a Liver Flush Debate, and of course I know there are more ducts in the liver than only the CBD.

http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1852914#i
The fact is that all anyone has to do is to read through these threads to see you you and "U" have been making things up as you go along in a desperate attempt to try and win a debate you cannot win since you clearly cannot present even one piece of credible evidence to counter the evidence I already presented. I did not even POST in the thread above; I did not 'make anything up'; I was not desperate in any way, and I presented very credible evidence in the thread where I originally posted.

http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1852865#i
Read my response to that post.  "U" did a great job of providing the proof that the argument you and she are using is bogus!
But I didn't present an "argument" and I made no claims...I only presented information and sources that show the size of the CBD and the size of endoscopic balloons & the stones passed by using them (and a "bit" about how the transverse colon is pressing on the liver/gallbladder, it would prevent expansion).

 

 

***

 

 

 

Things he believes should not be done in debate --

http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1866699#i Now, what is debate?  Debate involves taking a position and providing evidence to back that position.  Debate is not personal attacks, it is not making up lies about the other person, it is not looking through other forums to find anything to twist in a poor attempt to try and discredit someone.