Re: "When science cannot be questioned..." REPOST

If you choose to believe that your lab work was 100% accurate (when lab work is notoriously inaccurate, particularly imaging of 'soft' tissue and objects) and base your beliefs on a few Liver Flushes and that particular lab work, then that's what you choose to do & believe. In my opinion, that's not NEARLY enough of anything to have any type of solid foundation for theorizing & basing a belief/opinion (and certainly not for insisting to others that you "know" the "truth")...but perhaps in your opinion it is enough. That's your right & choice. Your experience would be particularly inconclusive if your purpose in doing the flushes originally was to "disprove liver flushing" (which I thought I'd read previously, but perhaps I didn't, or someone else wrote it). If you say your experience was 100% for learning, then I have no reason to believe otherwise.

Along that line, even a grade school Science student understands that when one enters into an experiment, the outcome is very likely to be impacted or clouded in some way by the preconceived opinion and desires of the original theory creator. And of course, the human body responds to our intent and beliefs very strongly. This applies to *everyone* that theorizes, debates, and experiments with any protocol...including liver flushing.

>>>People who have contradictory results should not be ignored, told they are doing it wrong, or simply written off as being biased. This is making a religion out of a protocol, when questioning and contradictory results are treated with derision. Liver Flushing is no exception.<<<

I agree 100% that no one should be treated with derision or ignored. Of course, if they ARE doing it wrong, or ARE biased, then their results and future opinions will naturally be wrong and/or biased.

>>>It is immoral, and frankly disgusting, to push a protocol, without providing all available information. Including information that does not agree with the theory of the protocol.<<<

And the opposite (I'm sure you agree) is true. Anyone that adamantly dismisses a protocol without providing all the available information is just as disgusting and immoral.

As is typical in debates, neither side provides ALL available information. That's why debating is such a learning experience...others can see both "limited versions" presented, do the research they require from that point, and come to their own conclusions.

Happy & Healthy New Year! :)

Uny









Tweet