Re: (edited typos) Re: "When science cannot be questioned..." REPOST

There is nothing about my statement that in ANY way weakens the validity of any of the points I may ever make regarding flushing. Whether I am correct regarding statistics on labwork, has nothing to do with whether my points on liver flushing are worthy of consideration.

Actually, yes it does. You made a sweeping generalization about lab tests, including scans claiming how innacurate they were.  While this is true for SOME tests, this does not apply to all.  So your whole argument was weakend by the fact that you were making up claims for things you clearly do not understand. What you did is akin to a mechanic telling a surgeon how they are doing an operation wrong.  You are pretending to be an expert on things you clearly are uninformed about.