Re: "When science cannot be questioned..." REPOST

<<<"Unfortunatley the "liver flush" supporters have no desire for real testing to be done because then they would have no excuses left when it is proven to be quackery.">>>

This is unfortunate indeed, if a protocol cannot stand up to scrutiny, then it needs serious looking at. People who put forward theories and protocols, (if they are genuine in their desire to really help people), would welcome debate, experimentation, results that differ from others, and scrutiny. No one with any conscience at all, would advocate a protocol, that has no basis in basic biology or anatomy, and could potentially cause a lot of harm.

If the protocol really does what it's advocates, claim it does, then they would not fear scrutiny. They would also welcome those who advise caution, and provide full and adequate warnings, for those who may have serious complications when trying this protocol.

We see the pharmaceutical industry, promoting and pushing products and treatments, without proper testing, or false claims, and with inadequate, or no warnings of the side effects or possible consequences. I would hate to see alternative medicine go the same way.

spud

Tweet