Here is another great quote:
" I know what volume is"
"Now we have according to your ridiculous claims 49 inches of flat "stones" apparently...This would give us a total volume of 29,412.25 cubic inches."
FecalSoap Tzu, The Dao of Math
Once again the same three people posting off topic as usual with nothing but insults. Hopefully the moderator of this forum will put a stop to their TOS violating games.
As for the last poster she is trying to mislead people by posting one sentence out of a whole post so what was said is misinterpreted. After that sentence was an entire explanation of what was over blown in the article. But the poster deliberately left that out to mislead people. Just another great example of what lengths the "liver flush" supporters will go to try and discredit anyone who provides solid evidence that "liver flushing" claims are a scam.
What they fail to realize is that these are DEBATE boards. Debate involves taking a stand on a position and providing EVIDENCE to back that position. Since they have been unable to provide any real evidence to support "liver flushing" they have relied instead on a constant barrage of attacks, lies and name calling such as "Captain _____" in an attempt to drive away anyone actually debating about "liver flushing". If these people are only going to come here to attack anyone questioning "liver flushing" instead of debating, especially within the TOS I would like to recommend that the moderator ban these posters from this board. This way the board will be limited to actual debates instead of their barrage of off topic name calling and other insults.
"This way the board will be limited to actual debates instead of their barrage of off topic name calling and other insults."
"... for the LF fools
...how gullible the LF supporters really are!
...they are clueless to human anatomy and physiology.
how ridiculous they really are being!!!
...taking advice from the LF supporters is nothing short of foolish!!!"
"[Edited by moderator]
[objectionable sentence removed]
[Message to Hveragerthi: avoid posting objectionable content or you will be banned from this forum!]"
"This way the board will be limited to actual debates instead of their barrage of off topic name calling and otherinsults."
"... for the LF fools
...how gullible the LF supporters really are!
...they are clueless to human anatomy and physiology.
how ridiculous they really are being!!!
...taking advice from the LF supporters is nothing short offoolish!!!"
"[Edited by moderator]
[objectionable sentence removed]
You missed the point. There are several posters here that have been posting NOTHING but attacks. There posts have NOTHING to do with "liver flushing" and the moderator has done nothing to stop them.
[Message to Hveragerthi: avoid posting objectionable content or you will be banned from this forum!]"
What is "objectionable content"? Any evidence posted showing "liver flushing" is objectionable to the "liver flush" supporters. On the other hand their constant barrage of attacks and lies are objectionable to not only me but some others I have spoken to. So why am I being targeted for banning while the "liver flush" supporters are left to run amok with constant attacks on anyone who is actually debating in a debate forum? Just more of the same old CureZone politics?
It is really simple, these are debate boards, not the personal bashing boards for the "liver flush" supporters. If they don't want to hear the evidence against liver flushing then stick to the "liver flush" support boards. If they don't want to provide real evidence in support of "liver flushing" in lieu of attacking people every chance they get then stick to the "liver flush" support forum. Trying to get someone banned for the sole reason that you have no real evidence to counter the fact that "liver flushing" is bogus just further proves the point I have been making all along.
Don't you think the appropriate place to leave a message for Hveragerthi would have been within the body of Hveragerthi's offending post? I certainly do!
Maybe since you edited Michael's post and removed an "objectionable sentence" you should do the same with Hveragerthi's post.
Personally, I find Hveragerthi's posts extremely offensive which is surely objectionable.
Of course you do. As I pointed out the LF supporters view any and all evidence presented that "liver flushing" as objectionable.
What I find interesting though is how nothing it ever said or done about the constant barrage of attacks by the "liver flush" supporters. That is truly objectionable, but they are never threatened with being banned since apparently the moderator is also a "liver flush" supporter. And we have all seen how they group together to try and censor any and all information proving "liver flushing" is a fraud.
In fact I would like to know who the moderator is because I think the webmaster needs to have a talk with this moderator since they are allowing the "liver flush" supporters get away with repeated name calling and other TOS violations while threatening the only person on this board actually debating "liver flushing" with banishment.