John,
so you will post the link to a study that supports or seems to support your argument, and then in the next breath denounce it by stating........................
"when big pharma starts talking about "therapeutic benefits" smart people run as fast as they can".
John, you can't have your cake and eat it as well. Either you support its conclusions or you do not.
Nit-picking, and twisting the conclusions of the study to suit your argument invalidates your argument for that reason.