Re: Question re zapper models!

>- Even people with no knowledge of electricity know that this is true.

There are electronic exceptions that uninformed individuals do not know about. Electricity has rules and leaving the other factors out gives the wrong answer.

I am perfectly willing and able to touch 1000 volts using a properly rated resistance and would do so un-harmed.

>- the most informative Zapper Comparison Charts available

Very biased. You fail to mention several short comings of your product, yet you nit pick about the competition.

>- No zapper comes close

Because you have not looked well enough.

>- I have never found your name anywhere

Really? And I quote from your site "The use of copper footpads was introduced by David Etheredge in the spring of 2003."

>- ** You must be hiding these items on your site
(the MX-2 and AV-2 definitely exceed your product.)

Yes, they were only offered to those who needed the extra power. There is not any need for many users to spend over a hundred dollars for a zapper. We have many customers that have had excellent results from the cheap little $65 zapper.

>- These 2 factors alone

Actually, not all is published, nor does it need to be.

>- I state on my site 16 volts is too high

I guess your limited electronics knowlege did not provide you with the answers needed to correctly compensate for the higher voltage. This is where an education in electronics and biomedical engineering comes into play. Anytime that a change is made in a circuit or device, other things may need to be changed to balance the resulting output. The advanced products that we offered have compensation circuits to provide the signals needed for best results. Sorry, but it appears that you just guessed at your circuit and that can cause problems. Not trying to bash it, but a knowlege of electronics can make a definite difference. I don't get how you feel that you can make a superior product without knowing what you are doing.

>- ** I do not see anywhere on your site where you have compared 2,000 Hertz with 2,500 Hertz

I only did a comparative study under the microscope of the amount of time to kill all bacteria living in a broth media. The times were the same, not difference. I did not publish it because I considered it "not important" There is nothing significant between the frequencies.

>- ** They are all battery-powered zappers without a stabilized wave. Same old, same old.

Wrong, being battery powered does not mean that the voltage output is not stabilized. Again, this is either your misconception or lack of understanding of electronics. As an example, battery powered zapper that outputs 10.5 volts stabilized can be easily built to run on 3 alkaline AAA batteries (4 if using NiCad or NiMh).

>- "I first heard of using the Hulda Clark parasite zapper to cure diseases from Wayne Green of magazine publishing fame." >- Did I read the word "cure" here or do I need to see the eye doctor or am I making things up?

Yes, I am re-iterating someone elses statement. And that is exactly what was said. I did not and do not claim cures. However, Wayne Green did feel and claim that the zapper could cure. I did hear about the use of the zapper as a cure from Wayne Green. That is how I introduce the topic.

>- still use the word "cure" on your site.

Yes, but not claiming a cure, but only referring to a statement from someone else.
I also use it to refer to a book " The Cure For All Diseases " and a couple of other books with similar titles. This is not a problem. I have discussed this with the FTC and the FDA. The FTC has thoroughly review my site on several occasions and this did request a couple of changes that we made without hesitation.

>- provides results that are superior to any other zapper in the world.

Sorry, but this is only hype. You do not know what results other zappers have achieved. You are only looking at what you think they do. There is no comparison by any independant 3rd party that says this. If it comes from you, without substantiation, it is only marketing hype. It may be your opinion, but I have been on these forums for several years and not one person has stated that other than you. I have heard some pretty strong claims about some other zappers but nothing like that about the UZ.

>- Would you publish their emails if they stated my zapper was only somewhat superior?

Actually, yes I would consider publishing comparative evaluations between zappers. I am not selling zappers for use on humans or animals so I do not have any competitive reason not to do this.

>- Again, logically, why would they write you?

Because we have asked them. We asked our customers what other zappers that they have used and which one they prefer. We have had 4 replies that preferred another zapper over the CCa. NONE of these preferred the UZ. We have sent out several thousand customer surveys and recieved some very interesting feedback.

>- Totally false and misleading.

How can you sit and make a boldface statement about something that you have never looked at or evaluated? You are talking out the wrong end in this respect and it is nothing but pure arrogance on your part.

>- MS is a state of toxicity cause by metals (most often dental mercury) and/or chemicals.

Hmmmm, how strange. I will have to call and tell some of the people that I know who have MS and let them know that they don't have it because they do not have any metal toxicities. They will be glad to hear that. Of course, now they will have to find out just what illness that they do have.

>- having overcome two incurable diseases,

I do not doubt your claim here, but I will submit that it is possible that you overcame them despite using the UZ. Your enthusiasm is great and is appreciated but sorry, I am not convinced.

As I stated before, I am willing not only for technical comparison but also a double blind results comparison and a quality comparison. As you have stated, you are not. That convinces me and probably most everyone else reading this that you are only offering hype that will fail on further inspection.

Also, as another point, 98 to 99 percent of zapper users do not have MS or similar illness. Most of them use zappers to reduce the presence of parasites in their body to avoid possible problems associated with parasites. They do not need electroporation, only a good clean square wave of reasonable frequency. They do not need expensive equipment, they need results, which they get. If the needed something stronger, then I would upgrade them.

Your claims that yours is the best, at best is conjecture, and without proof. That makes it hype. Only a person who had tried every zapper in the world and had no personal or financial interest could make that claim with any validity. Even then, that is only one persons opinion and does not make it so.

Finally, if your customers were so concerned, where are all the posts from them?