Re: Question re zapper models!

Hello,

Let me review your message point by point.

1. Regarding the links on the ParaZapper site, when I checked the site there were many links that were not working and I reported this on the Competition page on my site. It may be that they are working now. Nevertheless all the pages on the ParaZapper site that concern illness are generic. They repeat the same information which is largely promotional. All of the pages on my site that deal with illness provide solid information about specific illnesses and those pages are updated every month as more information is received. There is not a single generic page on my site.

2. May I re-emphasize that the owner of the ParaZapper site does not post their name on their site. A corporate name is not a personal name. The ParaZapper site is not a personal site with a personal story that people can relate to and think about. It is a corporate site. When people read my site they learn about the 2 incurable diseases I overcame and many other matters related to health. Grabbing for personal glory? I think that most people who have had contact with me over the years would not make that judgment. I have been helping people for the past 11 years from my site. I dedicated my life to helping people in 1996. It would be impossible for me to get my message across to people in the down-to-earth way that I do if I hid my name and gave my site a corporate look.

3. Contrary to your statement I never use the word cure on my site when relating the story of my recovery or when talking to people about recovering from serious illness. You can review every single line on my site and you will not find a single instance where I use the word cure or even imply it. I have yet to be able to trace the New Pathways article. Please provide the link. Frankly I think it is irrelevant why the ParaZapper was chosen to be written up in a magazine article. This does not negate the fact that The Ultimate Zapper is the most powerful zapper available. I state very clearly on the front page of my site why my zapper is superior. My "claim" of higher voltage is not a claim. It is a fact. You can state that other zappers "would have the same output". But the fact is that the other zappers don't have the same output. I prefer to deal with the facts, not with suppositions of what would be, might be, could be or should be.

4. You state that there are "many serious flaws" with my "claims"? What flaws are you referring to, exactly. What claims are you referring to, exactly. You say you "could go on" about them but then you refuse to do so. Why not go on about them? Why not be specific about them rather than dealing in vagueness and innuendo? Why not be specific? I don't understand? My site explains very specifically and very clearly why The Ultimate Zapper is, by far, the most powerful zapper in the world.

5. There are over 100 testimonials in the testimonial archive on my site. If my zapper were ineffective how could so many people be experiencing such remarkable results with it?

Sincerely,
Ken Presner
http://zap.intergate.ca