Re: Question re zapper models!

>- I suggest you both send me your schematics, and I'll evaluate the circuit designs against a list of mutually agreed-upon parameters

My schematic for the Standard ParaZapper with dual frequencies is freely published in my book. The CCa (or MX-2 or AV-2) schematic could be sent upon a "non-compete / non-disclose" agreement through an attorney. However, the schematic does not tell all.

While I do not sell zappers for use on humans, I would be willing to send a CCa for strength of signal "applied to the human body" and range of harmonics "applied to the human body". This would be done in order to verify Ken's claims because it is the signal applied to the human body that is of concern to his customers. The reason for this is that any artificial load such as a pure resistance or a R-C network can produce misleading results. Of course, the FDA requires that any professional using such devices for human research must registed with them. If such a test was done, I would suggest at least 10 different voluntary participants.

Of course, possibly I could send a ParaZapper MX-2 which has 16 frequencies, 100 percent positive offset, and an apparant 18 volts applied to the test subject.

Or, I could possibly send a ParaZapper AV which has 16 preselected Rife frequencies, 100 percent positive offset, and an apparant 18 volts applied to the test subject.

However, this point may just be mute because as Ken states, he claims to be the strongest available for use on humans. Also, since, in the US, it is illegal (according to the FDA) to sell zappers for use on humans or animals, Ken basically does not have any competition at all.