Re: Question re zapper models!

Due to time constraints, I am not taking time to respond to all of your claims but will respond to the following:

*** You have conveniently used this excuse before. I notice on this forum that you make time for answering at length whatever you choose to answer. When you don't want to answer specific comments and questions that I pose all of a sudden you have time constraints.

>- sure this is not music to your ears.

Actually, it is irrelevant.

*** It is not irrelevant. It is your way of avoiding issues and trying to manipulate people.

I am not competing, only doubting your claims.

*** On the contrary, you are very much competing, just as I am competing. That is what business is all about. But I do far more than compete on my site. I provide helpful information, as well. People have to pick through your site with a fine tooth comb to pick up any useful information at all that that is not related to selling your zapper. My site is full of useful information for my readers. You constantly fall back on the excuse, "Gotta consult with my lawyers." This is a very lame excuse for maintaining a site that is devoted solely to commercialism, with a pretense of providing health information.

*** It is clear that you try to dominate this forum. You are not providing a social service here, you are competing for business. Which is why you try to dominate the forum. This has to be obvious to the forum's readers.

>>- #1 - the square wave contains only odd integer harmonics.

>- ** Not according to Dr. Lloyd.

Then Dr. Lloyd is lacking in knowlege of square waves.

*** The classic square wave, as produced by your zapper, only contains odd integers But there is a superior square wave, as produced by The Ultimate Zapper, that is far more advanced, which you refer to as a rectangular wave. It produces superior harmonics.

*** The bottom line is that you cannot hide behind textbook definitions to explain away the superior effectiveness of The Ultimate Zapper. You have yet to address this question which is the crux of the whole matter. The Ultimate Zapper produces superior results. Period.

>>- #2 - A true square wave has a 50% duty cycle - equal high and low periods.

>- ** Not true. An INFERIOR true wave has a 50% duty cycle

Wrong again, A true square wave has 50 percent duty cycle and only odd harmonics. Anything else is a rectangular wave.

*** The Ultimate Zapper produces superior results by changing the duty cycle. You may technically call the classic square wave a true square wave if you like. This does not change the fact that The Ultimate Zapper produces the most effective square wave of any zapper. Call it rectangular if you wish.

>>- Your zapper does not produce a true square wave

>- ** This ranks as the grossest of all the inaccuracies you have printed on this site about The Ultimate Zapper. It shows to what lengths you will go to lie about my zapper. People can see that this is a bald-faced lie by viewing the true square wave in the oscilloscope pictures on the front page of my site at

Your output is a rectangular wave. A true square wave has equal sides, exactly 50 percent duty cycle. Read any electronics text book.

*** This is technically correct. Which is why I chose to produce a wave that is squarer than square, in the metaphoric sense, and remains square because it is stabilized. Your zapper's wave is not stabilized. So, it is not a square wave at all under load, only on the oscilloscope. Your zapper has a square wave only according to the technical text book definition of a square wave, not in the real sense i.e when people are using your zapper i.e when it is under load. Your zapper clearly produces an inferior square wave which is much less effective than the square wave, call it what you will, produced by The Ultimate Zapper. The fact remains that The Ultimate Zapper's square wave produces superior results and always remains square under load.

>>- and a square wave does not provide even harmonics.

>- ** You should talk to Dr. Lloyd about this. He would certainly disagree with you.

Dr. Lloyd is welcome to call and talk at any time on my dime. The fact is that a true square wave by definition only produces odd harmonics. Again, read the text books.

*** You can fall back on all the text books and all the definitions you wish to fall back on. This does not change for one nanosecond the fact that The Ultimate Zapper's square wave is superior to the so-called square wave produced by your zapper.

>- ** The more you try to discredit my zapper the more you paint yourself into a corner because

There is no effort to discredit your zapper, only your unsubstantiated claims.

*** There most certainly is, in my opinion. But your efforts are fruitless because all the people who get amazing results with The Ultimate Zapper show that you are wrong.

What you have offered is not proof and would not stand up to legal scrutiny.

*** Legal scrutiny? Since when is there a true legal standard for zappers other than that imposed by the FDA? This is the latest in a series smoke screens you have put up in this forum to distract people from the important issues. You keep repeating "no proof" in all of your postings about The Ultimate Zapper's effectiveness. The ultimate proof is in the results people get when they use my zapper. After all, that is the only proof that matters. People seeking relief are not seeking text book definitions. They are seeking results. And they get those results with The Ultimate Zapper. That's the bottom line.

Heck, you are not even willing to have a 3rd party comparison preformed.

*** This has been discussed ad infinitum in previous postings.

Sincerely,
Ken Presner
http://zap.intergate.ca