Re: Question re zapper models!

>- claim on this forum that one is not linked to the other.

To my knowlege, I have never made such a claim. Most of my 32 web sites on different topics are linked to each other. I only sell zappers on one site and specifically for water treatment.

>- An empty site with empty links is useful enough

First, the site is not empty, second, the links are not empty. They may not have all of the information that you seem to require, but they provide enough to generate sales for many zapper manufacturers.

>- #1 for "zappers"

That is new and congratulations, you pushed island.net down a couple of notches. However, being ranked first on a page is mostly due to keyword placement and use. I was actually referring to page rank which reflects overall popularity.

** By either measure my site is hugely successful and receives a consistently high number of page hits as well as site hits.

>- may be able to fool Google but you cannot fool the people

A lot of site visitors see the value in my site even if you do not.

** Your site has no value in terms of its health information. This is not bashing, it is a fact. Anyone looking at your site will find no useful health information there. Compare this to the very informative pages on my site. It is clear that I work very hard at providing useful information for people and that you do not. There is no comparison whatsoever. That's why I rate consistently very high on Google and other search engines for specific health issues.

Not all of my pages are as you describe.

** By inference you are finally admitting here that many of your pages are empty of content.

>- ...independent third party evaluation ... Those who are interested in this discussion can refer to an earlier posting where I explain very cogently the transparency of this ploy.

Another ploy to dodge the bullet. You claim to be the best but can not provide proof.

** The proof is in the results, as I have stated many times on this forum. All that people are really looking for is results and it is abundantly clear that the results are there for them with The Ultimate Zapper. You try to challenge that by calling the testimonials on my site anecdotal like the FDA does (are not your unpublished testimonials likewise anecdotal?), and by demanding scientific proof according to a narrow set of criteria and under conditions which I do not agree to. It's that simple. End of discussion.

It is more than obvious that base your success on bashing others

** The truth is that, up until recently, I was so busy with my site that I did not have the time to keep track of this forum. After receiving of 2 or 3 emails from customers I started to look at the forum and found that you were making unfair and inaccurate comments about The Ultimate Zapper and about my site, which provoked me to respond. Had you not been bashing my zapper and my site I would not even have bothered entering the fray. I will not let unfair comments pass without responding, if I become aware of them. I may not be able to participate in the forum on a regular basis because I really am very busy with my site. But when I can I will check in and see what is happening from time to time and I will make the time to respond if the need arises. Until next time, in a week or 2, adios.

Sincerely,
Ken Presner
http://zap.intergate.ca


and making unsubstantiated claims for yours. Even you claims about Dr. Lloyd are only hearsay.

** We've covered these topics very well in previous postings.