CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Question re zapper models!
 
ParaZapper Views: 10,272
Published: 18 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,023,677

Re: Question re zapper models!


>- *** On the contrary, you are very much competing, just as I am competing.

Actually, I am not. I do not sell zappers for use on humans and have not for a year and a half. I do sell them for water treatment purposes. The old sites remain up for information purposes.

>- *** This is technically correct. Which is why I chose to produce a wave that is squarer than square, in the metaphoric sense, and remains square because it is stabilized

First, it is misleading and false for you to claim that a square wave can be squarer than square. Yours is not a true square wave.

Additionally, the wave that you think so highly of has only half the power of any frequency compared to a true square wave.

Also, it does not produce even harmonics as you claim. Instead, it produces a second set of odd harmonics.

Lastly, you are only comparing your stabilized output to the cheaper models of zappers. ParaZapper CCa has a stabillized output due to the CCa technology. We just do not make such a big dealabout the stabilizing because the current boost is more important.

 

Share


 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2025  www.curezone.org

0.125 sec, (1)