Re: No,loquat1 you'd never believe Dr. Clark's work.

See, right there. You imply that because I disagree with your reasoning about who owns the dictionary, it somehow proves my 'inconsistencies'.

The original premise was you implying it was owned by the pharmaceutical cartel, which I then disagreed--pointing out the the 'elites', owners of all the abusive industries and systems, who are also owners of the cartel, are behind the 'new' form of dumbed down dictionary as well as the dumbed down educational system. NOT the cartel, although owned by the same people, two entirely different facets, and not at all inconsistent. Then you try to lump them all together, ignoring the very clear distinction, to prove your claim of 'inconsistency'

It's you who's removed the distinction, not me. The inconsistency is on your part, deliberately, intended to appear superior and trying confuse matters to make the readers buy your story to discredit me (yet again). Simple loquat lover/squirrel hater, I think not. And me, using the dumbed down version--what's that? Attempted irony, again?? It is funny at least. :)

I'd ask how many debate classes you got A's in (3), but opps. We know the answer to that already.

Although it really doesn't prove much, what is your IQ? How big and beautiful is your brain, really? Tweet