Re: This study proves my point! (edit)
No, this study does not prove your point whatsoever.
You are advocating dangerous advice and mocking the work of a great man who has helped thousands. Worse of all, you don't even understand what he is saying let alone WHY.
In the exact same way you were projecting faulty reasoning onto me then arguing against it, you are projecting faulty reasoning onto Cutler's protocol then arguing against it. Don't assume that just because you interpreted his protocol in an incomplete, simple minded way, that he himself incorporated the same faulty reasoning you have when formulating his statements.
Andy did not make such a simple minded statement as "if you don't follow the every three hours schedule you will get permanently worse." This is coming from your level of understanding. 3 hours is the recommended dosing interval when using dmsa in conjunction with ALA because it is the HALF LIFE of ALA. When using DMSA alone a 4 hour interval is recommended because it is the HALFLIFE of dmsa. Do you understand the reasoning behind it? Better read his book one more time. The 3 hour interval is not the religious dogma which your mind projects it to be!
Do you know what a HALF LIFE is? Find out. Then connect the dots: this child's dosing schedule was every 6 hours; frequent enough that more dmsa was administered before the prior dose ran out. It's not exactly an infrequent dose. Still not ideal per Cutlers reasoning, but it doesnt prove anything against it. But then again, you don't seem to care because it's not within the THREE HOUR COMMANDMENT that the evil dictator emphatically declared will make you PERMANENTLY WORSE and leave you burning in FIRE and BRIMSTONE!
In case you missed it, I was being sardonic. You are advocating dangerous advice, mocking the work of a man who has helped thousands, and immaturely responding with pseudo Science
to anyone who informs or corrects you. You are contributing absolutely zero to the well being of mankind. Are you proud of yourself for "proving" Cutler "wrong"? (in your mind at least).
Ask yourself a question: How many years do you think a 2 year old child has been exposed to mercury? I hope you can figure that one out. This case is obviously of acute poisoning, most likely from vaccination. Andy's protocol is geared toward the majority of mercury poisoning cases, resulting from dental Amalgams
that have accumulated in the body for years, often decades. Do you understand the relevance... at all? Probably not. But here it is: an infrequent large dose of DMSA or DMPS mobilises a lot more mercury in a body that has been poisoned for decades than an acute case of a 2 year old. The childs body did not store the mercury in deeper recesses and so an intravenous dose taken every 6 hours would help a lot more than hurt her.
Do you even know what Cutler's protocol IS? And WHY he recommends what he recommends? Stop obsessing over the WHAT and figure out the WHY, and maybe you will stop ranting for the sake of wanting to be special.