Edited

NOTE - I'm going to post this message again, I tried to post it once and it didn't seem to show up. hopefully it works this time

----------

give me a break

Just because somebody disagrees with you they have "mercury on their brain"? and then of course you have compassion on me? Good grief

these kind of petty passive aggressive condescending insults don't fly with me. learn to address the issue at hand without being petty and personal and insulting. Thank you

now I'll address some of your points.

You said "READ AGAIN: if you are experiencing negative reactions from chelation, REDISTRIBUTION is occurring."

really? You do realize that some people have really terrible reactions to 100 mg of any chelator even taken on a three-hour dosing schedule, right? Some have negative reactions to 50 mg, some even have negative reactions to 10 mg! Are you saying redistribution happens with 10 mg of any chelator taken in the proper three-hour dosing schedule?


and you seem to be missing my main point which I made multiple times.

Frequent low-dose chelation (i.e. every three hours) is most likely the most effective and efficient method of chelation.

The only thing I am arguing against is the idea that if you don't stick to that schedule you'll make yourself PERMANENTLY WORSE. something that Andy loves to say over and over again. I don't buy it. And there's no logic and there's no scientific study that backs him up on this

Can you point to one single chelation study which shows any human being, any rat, any mouse got permanently worse because they didn't stick to a three hour dosing schedule?

I have searched high and low and I can find no such study. If you have one I would love to read it

I did however find one study which clearly shows that a real live human being with mercury poisoning got permanently BETTER on a six hour chelation dosing schedule. I linked that study. Anybody can read it. Tweet