Re: Vitamin D appears to be 800% more effective than vaccines at preventing influenza

It appears that there is indeed no end of studies you already have posted, many of which are 15 or more years old and many of which were conducted on mice, which points to immuno-suppression by vitamin D.  Once again, the above study talks about the benefits of viamin D in preventing dangerous autoimmune response:

"When given in vivo, the hormone prevents the development of spontaneous and induced models of autoimmunity."

The studies you post, by and large, do not support the Marshall hypothesis of vitamin D being harmful.  Often just the opposite when you look at the context of the studies and the conclusions.

Now, when it comes to posting studies - I promise you that for every study you post which might indicate actual harm from vitamin D when taken in sensible levels, I could post scores and scores of studies showing benefits for vitamin D.  Is it not the case, in fact, that one of your and the other vitamin D fringe groups contentionsof harm from vitamin D the overwhelming preponderence of studies and support that are in favor of vitamin D?

Are we to believe that anything that mainstream medicine or science largely supports is automatically a conspiracy to harm us?  You know, the overwhelming preponderance of evidence and support of medical science also tells us of the benefits of water and oxygen.  Should we therefore try to limit or avoid those items too?