CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: The FDA doesn't recognize MMS
 

J.Crow’s® Lugol’s Iodine
Free S&H.Restore lost reserves.J.CROW’S®Lugol’s Iodine Solut...



Energy Awareness Course
Use CureZone kode to get a free session!



Dr. Clark Shop
Hulda Clark Cleanses


SilverFox Views: 5,271
Published: 15 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,406,744

Re: The FDA doesn't recognize MMS


Hello Foyboys,

1. Chlorous acid is a broad spectrum microbial. Anecdotally, it seems to have some beneficial effects inside the human body, but topically it works very well.

2. There are many anecdotal reports of people feeling better after starting to take sodium chlorite solutions. Most of the cases I am aware of start with self diagnosis, involve self prescribed treatment of which a sodium chlorite solution is one of many substances used during the course of treatment, then end with a self declaration of a return to normal health. This is a far cry from seeing the complete reversal of many diseases.

I find it very interesting that when Jim Humble was approached by a charity wanting to fully fund the distribution of Miracle-Mineral-Supplement into areas suffering from malaria, he was unable to provide documentation that Miracle-Mineral-Supplement was effective with malaria. It seems strange to me that out of the claimed hundreds of thousands of people using Miracle-Mineral-Supplement , and with the claims of over 17000 being cured of malaria by Jim Humble himself, no one was able to provide proof that MMS actually works for malaria.

MMS is supposed to be the miracle for curing malaria. In spite of all his claims and his "documentation" in his book, Jim Humble is unable to prove that it actually works well enough to have it widely distributed. I sincerely hope he is able to do some tests that prove its efficacy, but perhaps the burden of proof is too much to ask for...

3. Since there are no long term studies, it gets hard to determine if drinking sodium chlorite solutions at the MMS concentrations are contributing to death or serous illnesses or not. I recently received an email from someone who's friend had used high concentrations of MMS for over a year. This friend has now been diagnosed with colon cancer.

Did MMS cause or contribute to this? If this person dies from colon cancer, what part did MMS play in this? I am unable to answer these questions. My hunch is that sodium chlorite solutions at low doses would not do harm, but when I review all of the adverse effects that people experience when following the MMS protocol, I really don't know...

4. Here we are in almost total agreement. Actually, no further testing is needed to improve sanitary conditions and to improve water quality in these areas. This has already been tested and proven to work. It just needs to be funded and implemented.

Doctors working in these areas are already using chlorine dioxide solutions to sterilize their instruments, work areas, and for wound care. The testing and documentation for these uses has already been done and efficacy has been proven.

As far as ingesting sodium chlorite products, this is where testing is needed, and efficacy need to be proven. I might point out that efficacy is evidence based, rather than anecdotal based.

I originally was under the impression that Jim Humble had evidence based data, but later found out that was not the case. I have gone round and round with him asking him to share his test results, and he has gone round and round with me telling me to read his book.

5. Jim Humble claims that hundreds of thousands of people have been cured of illnesses following the MMS protocol. If those people took the time to document their journey to recovery, the medical community would be forced to sit up and take notice. How about you? Have you taken the time to document your journey to recovery? Have you shared it with the medical professionals in your area? What did they have to say?

A while back a cancer clinic asked people to send in their documentation of what their diagnosis was, and documentation on how their cancer was "cured" using MMS. They planned to submit this as a loose clinical trial. Not exactly a "formal" clinical trial, but they felt it would make an impact on the medical community if the documentation was sound and with observations reported by medical professionals.

Participation in this study was voluntary, and all personal information was to be removed before copies of the records were submitted. After a few months, they expanded the scope of the project to all illnesses. The total number of participants over about a year was ZERO.

I am not sure how to interpret these results, but they seem to be less than favorable...

Tom
 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.406 sec, (2)