Re: The FDA doesn't recognize MMS

Hello Foyboys,

Like I said you are both a liar and a fool... [sadly shaking my head icon]

Let's look at the patents you listed.

In order to bleach teeth you use a 0.5% sodium chlorite solution, and don't swallow it.

For eyes, you preferably use a concentration of available chlorine dioxide in the 1 - 5 PPM range. This is a 0.0005% solution. Once again, you don't swallow it.

The creams and lotions are made from a 2% sodium chlorite solution, and once again not used for ingestion.

The mouthwash incorporates a preferred 0.1% sodium chlorite solution. This is also not meant for ingestion.

The HIV topical solution involves a 2% sodium chlorite solution.

The WF-10 trials have not worked out, and they involved something a little different, but similar to sodium chlorite. In back to back tests, there was less irritation with the WF-10 compound, but while it showed promise, it was lacking in efficacy.

Compare these topical applications with Miracle-Mineral-Supplement which is intended to be taken internally. Miracle-Mineral-Supplement is a 28% sodium chlorite solution. It is listed as having 224000 PPM chlorine dioxide. If you put some Miracle-Mineral-Supplement in your eyes, you would go blind. Even Jim Humble warns against that.

I think you are lying when you pull out patents for normal dose chlorine dioxide or sodium chlorite applications, and imply that because the normal concentrations are patented, they must be safe, and since MMS is also a sodium chlorite solution, it, by association, must also be safe.

I think you are a fool for associating all of the safety studies done on normal dose applications, and then applying it to the extremely high MMS concentrations. You imply that if a chlorine dioxide product is safe for your eyes, MMS is safe to drink. That sounds foolish to me.

There are thousands of uses for sodium chlorite and chlorine dioxide. There is a way to safely use products made from these chemicals, and loads of testing to prove both safety and efficacy. They work extremely well, and are safe to use when you follow the directions.

When I see certified laboratory test results indicating that a 0.1% sodium chlorite solution is effective against MRSA I wonder why we are even talking about the 28% MMS solution.

OK, I'll back off now. It looks like you had an "Ah Ha" moment and are beginning to realize that the concentrations and amounts used are vastly different. Yes, sodium chlorite solutions are being used, but the concentrations and activation methods are entirely different. The same goes for the use of chlorine dioxide. There are many ways to produce chlorine dioxide. Some produce a very pure gas, other ways end up with a lot of production by products. Water purification uses a pure form of chlorine dioxide gas. The safety studies don't address any of the issues that may arise from the production by products involved with the MMS protocol.

You may not care for the FDA, but in this case they are correct. The 28% sodium chlorite MMS solution used according to the MMS protocol is not generally recognized as safe or effective for the claims referenced.

Tom Tweet