Re: The FDA doesn't recognize MMS

Interesting post. So let's throw the baby out with the bath water? Or would it be better to revamp a system already in place. There has to be a governing body, or people like Jim Humble will be allowed to endanger the health of others with their false claims, lies about trials, and lies about cures for diseases that simply never happened. I guess for many, it seems like no big deal, but for those of us that suffer from chronic, progressive disease, there are so many false claims, and so many ways to get your hopes up. People like Humble feed on the desperation, and thank God there is something that can be done to stop the vultures like him. Complain all you like, but the FDA has done some good, the doctors do help people, and the government is not out to get you. Perhaps using the intelligence that God gave us, we can find a way for the system to work, but simply complaining on curezone, and taking a chemical without finding out the truth about it will accomplish nothing, other than future problems. Seems to me that allowing every silly goldminer that comes along to make outrageous claims, and make money is counter productive. Freedom is relative. One man's freedom is another man's downfall. Anarchy serves only the criminal. There need to be laws to protect us from con's like Humble. People here are good at reading little bits of info, gain a minimal understanding of the human body, and making up the rest. Within days of someone posting their theory, the theory becomes fact, and the truth gets lost. How does that help anything? WHy is that better than the big pharma? Jim Humble is doing the same thing that the big pharma is doing, just on a smaller scale, and he is called a hero. He is as big a con as Merck. So don't you think that revamping the system is smarter than allowing the Jim Humble's of this world to laugh all the way to the bank, all the while creating future illnesses for the medical community to handle? Tweet