better to simply be a good contributor (as you, Chris, always were)and bow out
of the moderating.(imv Let the Webmaster assign (or not!) someone who's willing
to be anonymous: a wise and sensible state that has been seen to be the preferred choice, after years of witnessing human nature unfold.
Chiron, I respect you and value your posts; however, on this one issue I have to respectfully disagree.
When Steve & Chris were appointed as moderators, the vast majority of the frequent posters were delighted with this info - who better to moderate the forum to ensure proper information was going out about water fasting than the 2 who have so openly given of their time and advice and are living examples of the benefits of water fasting.
It was not until the recent attacks by 2 members of this forum on Chris that this even became an issue. The hard cold truth is that according to CZ rules, they have intentionally argued with a moderator and as such are subject to banning because such activity disrupts the forum.