Re: Debunking The 9/11 Myths - Mar. 2005 Cover Story

He even supports QuackWatch as a result, and everything QuackWatch reports is 100% true as a result.

Patently untrue, I've never said that.

Which parts of QuackWatch are untrue, then?

Since it is you who made the claim it is up to you to prove I wrote what you claim. Don't try to shift the burden of proof on to me. Cute trick, do I have to tell you why it is wrong?

As you may have read in one of my previous posts on this forum I do not use Google, I use Ixquick because they do not store the search histories of their users. Either way, I do not need a search engine to find the glaring faults in your arguments.

I also never said that is not possible that the gov't would not be 'willing' to do what you claim, what I have said is that it has not happened and that there is no evidence to support any conspiracy claim. I believe in the abortion debate I wrote something like “Governments do shitty things to their people because they have the power and feel justified”, I am very clear on the terrible things governments are capable of. So again you are making false accusations about my beliefs on the subject. So what is your excuse? Carelessness? Dishonesty? Ignorance?