Re: Who is a more harmful sadam or bush....??

I do not support sadams use of chemical weapons but i also do not support this war.... if you look into the statistics clrearly there are a lot more people killed by the bombs in baghdad than are killed by the iraqi army.

when it comes to the brits if u see their past they have occupied colonies all throughout the world and drained a whole alot of countries of their wealth how can we trust some one who has the past history of looting a whole lotta countries they came to india as traders (east india company) and then ruled india for 200yrs

Americas past is golden and it has a very friendly atmosphere and i would say it is one of the est democracies of the world but when it comes to foreign policy americans have a habit of poking their nose into every thing....

my dear friend all i want to say to u there is no achivement or outcome of war

Peace can only be achived with peace there is a humane side in all of us ......
all i am trying to say is this war could have been avoided and should be stopped now america shld not shy away from trying a peaceful resolution if it manages to do this peacefully i will definitely regard it more highly than i do now

Tweet