Re: Who is a more harmful sadam or bush....??

hey gonads,

I agree to whatever u have to say about sadam... and i am not favouring sadam but i think there could have been a peaceful solution to this problem...

What abt north korea on the verge of becoming a nuclear power is america going to invade it to...

what abt pakistan on whom america has lifted all the sanctions which were imposed after it became nuclear and it is ruled by a dictator Parvez mushraf pakistan also supports cross border terrorisom against india and now because america needs pakistan to find osmana bin laden pakistan has been given huge sums of money

Bin laden was supported by the americans against the russians in the afghanisthan war....they are responsible for making him powerful

who gave weapons to sadam when americans thought iran to be a threat americans have supported a dictator(sadam)and now they are supporting parvez mushraf (pakistan)

Foregin policy cannot change according to ur will and fancies

Wasnt sadam a dictator when america supported him against Iran?

PEACE CAN BE ACHIVED ONLY BY PEACE WAR IS NO CONCLUSION TO ANY DISPUTE....

I WOULD ALSO WANT ALL OF U TO VISIT THE ARABIC NEWZ CHANNEL ALJAZEERA'S WEB SITE THEN U WILL ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT DAMAGE THE COALITION IS DOING TO HARMLESS INNOCENT CIVILIANS IN IRAQ

www.english.aljazeera.net (english version) www.aljazeera.net
These sites might be down becoz some authorities do not want ppl to see exactly what their bombs are doing in iraq Tweet