CureZone   Log On   Join
Who is a more harmful Saddam or Bush -- Stalin or Hiltler Hmmmmm ....??
 
Wizard Views: 1,968
Published: 21 y
 
This is a reply to # 451,715

Who is a more harmful Saddam or Bush -- Stalin or Hiltler Hmmmmm ....??


No one says Saddam is great. but let's look at some facts. The shaw of Iran was a dictator, but our friend. We told him to be nice to his people or we would cut off his aid. He started to be nice to his people. Those people that he was nice too, overthrew him, ran him out of the country and took our U.S hostages and started torturing and murdering their competeing religous factions.
Then follow the domino effect. Iraq goes to war with Iran, we side with saddam and provide him with weapons because we now hate Iran.
Great move huh? If we would have just left the Shaw alone, he would be friends with Iran still, we would not have made Saddam so powerful. If we would have minded our own business in Afganistan, then we would not have aided Bin Laden in defeating the russians.Another great move that paid off. How about the 40 billion we spend to defend Saudi Arabia, who has plenty of human rights violations, it's just they have oil, so we don't care. Then because we are defending them, the saudi's hate us and that's where the hijackers came from. This thought that the U.S is so kind needs to go. We need to mind our own business.
 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.125 sec, (1)