CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Scientific reading
 
resurrectionist Views: 5,626
Published: 19 y
 
This is a reply to # 413,241

Re: Scientific reading


These Conspiracy theories only work for countries where there is a lot of private practise. The NHS has no incentive to overtreat.

Conspiracy theories are essentially lazy. I mention HAART and immediately you claim this is a Conspiracy because drug companies make money out of the anti-retrovirals. Since the alternative medicine industry makes a lot of money I fail to see your point.

Your opinion is that natural alternatives are better than statins. What is the basis for that belief? Why does it matter if the treatment is from a botanical plant or a chemical plant? a chemical is a chemical is a chemical
 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.204 sec, (1)