done and dusted... debunked... it looks like most here disagree, for obvious previously discussed, reasons. that article was hardly determinative. you may claim that the debate is over all you want, but I'm afraid its not true. and the flushing will go on, proving you incorrect, and the mainstream journal incorrect.
one study i would have an intrest in. take 100 openminded chronically ill people, let them follow curezone protocals for 2 years. take another 100 similar people, let them stay with the docs. compare the two groups. that would be interesting, though no doubt you will complain how unscientific it is. I did my own test comparing mainstream and alternative treatments, but we already know how that came out, don't we. I still chuckle at my old doc's incompentence.